A publisher who decides to no longer publish a book is not censorship. The Republican party wants to make this about Democrats and censorship. It's a nice trick and it's working. However, we need to correct people on this constantly. A publisher is declining to publish a book that it published for decades as they feel that parts of it can be offensive. This is completely the publishers right to do so, and Publishers do decide to not continue to publish a book for a variety of reasons, this can be just one of them. The Suess family could then take the book to another publisher. Again, this is not censorship. Don't let people spin this.